The missing bridge between GIS sw and 3D authoring tools will be be increasingly useful, but I agree with Hamish to do not reinvent (complex) pieces of softwares.
I think the main missing pieces are: - 3D database capabilities, i.e. being able to link consistently a 3D element (whatever we mean in the context of a specific 3D data model) to a DB. - mantain (somehow) geographical references to import back from 3D authoring sw (e. g. v.in.blender). Do you have experimented robust workflows that can do one or both things? giovanni Il 19/mag/2014 08:51 "Vincent Bain" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Le lundi 19 mai 2014 à 18:44 +1200, Hamish a écrit : > > so just my 2c. > Hamish, your "2c" is a wise synthesis! redundancy often brings nothing > but confusion... > > V. > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
