On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Thomas Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Micha, > > You raise very good questions. I think you may have misunderstood; perhaps I > explained poorly. r.watershed is NOT running slowly; I have had no problems > with r.watershed performance. The performance slowness I have had is with > r.carve -- it is running very slowly.
I just tried the example mentioned in r.carve's manual page: on my small laptop it takes 2.5 seconds for 2 million pixels. How many rows/columns do you have? Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
