Dear GRASS Gurus,

During the last days I've discovered a strange behaviour of r.watershed and D8. 
The used DEM is the result from a landscape evolution model and there are no 
depressions. I cannot use MFD as the D8-FlowDirections input data of a variety 
of tools I've written during the last years.

I got obviously wrong values for the flow accumulation of r.watershed and D8. 
The number of cells in the Flow Accumulation grid at the outlet point was 
significantly smaller than the area of catchment analysed catchment (spatial 
resolution in north south and east west direction is 1) also computed with 
GRASS using r.water.outlet and a conversion to an Area. I checked Flow 
Accumulation at the the outlet with an alternative code of a colleague and the 
contributing drainage area was exactly the value
of the catchment size computed with r.water.outlet.

I further found some deviations in the flow direction grid. In some cases the 
flow routing leads to the lowest neighbouring cell which however might not be 
the steepest decent. r.watershed chooses sometimes a diagonal flow direction 
while the the local channel gradient would be greater in horizontal direction.

I started some test runs with very simple geometries. I've defined a ramp with 
r.mapcalc that dips in north direction and I expected that the this will also 
be shown by the flow direction of r.watershed. However, this is not the case. 
The synthetic DEM features a watershed!!! See attachment.  It seems that 
r.watershed fills the region (without need). This strange behavior disappears 
in by applying the multiple flow direction algorithm.


I have tested with the latest versions grass70 , grass71 and grass645.
Here is a test case (grass71). I would be great if somebody could reproduce the 
problem and show me a workaround.

---------------------------------------------------------
g.region w=0 e=1000 s=0 n=1000 res=1 -p
r.mapcalc "DEM = 1000 - y()"
r.watershed -s elevation=DEM@PERMANENT accumulation=ACC drainage=DIR


Please help

Jörg






_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to