Carlos, 2015-11-16 14:47 GMT-05:00 Carlos Grohmann <[email protected]>:
> GRASS 7.1.svn (base_maps):~ > g.region -p raster=gdem_etopo1_ice > cells: 233280000 > > GRASS 7.1.svn (base_maps):~ > r.univar map=gdem_etopo1_ice -ge > percentile=100 > cells=58320000 > > GRASS 7.1.svn (eqarea):~ > r.univar map=gdem_etopo1_ice -ge percentile=100 > cells=233280000 > Notice how the number of pixels differs, that's the reason the statistics are not the same, I don't get why the region has a different number of pixels than the raster itself in the original latlong projection... I think that's the root of the issue -- *César Augusto Ramírez Franco* Laboratorio de Sistemas Complejos Naturales Escuela de Geociencias - Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín Teléfono: (57-4) 430 9369 - 300 459 6085 http://labscn-unalmed.github.io/
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
