Hi and thanks again. Actually, there are no rock glaciers in the study area rather than those I have already mapped (hopefully). The reason why I am using a superviosed is because I am using the rock glaciers (i.e. the cumulative solar radiation, the band 4 reflectance, and elevation) as a proxy of permafrost presence, which is not visible. The aim is to map it using the statistics held in the RGB over the rock glaciers. As you said, the way is to use the rejection map, but strangely I have more rejection on the rock glaciers themselves which were used as ROIs, than elsewhere. This sounds quite strange to me, and this is something I would need to fix to go on.
-- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/i-maxlik-strange-classification-output-and-reject-map-tp5242179p5242364.html Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
