I also noticed that r.stream.extract finds different flow-paths than r.watershed, which complicates comparisons between the two. The work-around for this is to use a mask to force r.stream.extract to find the flow-path you want.
r.stream.extract is the preferred stream extraction tool.
OK, but a flow accum raster is required for running r.stream.order (which outputs flow_accum) and AFAIK, the only way to get a flow_accum raster is with r.watershed.
??


BTW, I'm not the only one who has encountered this:

http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/201118/how-to-obtain-accumulation-map-from-r-stream-extract

Thanks,

Best,
Micha



_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to