Hi Maxi,

Yes, it is used and works well :)
You remember correctly, that was what I used.

Thank you and your colleague for the fine work at r.damflood.

Cheers,
Codrina


On 30/08/2017 11:56, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
Hi, glad to see the module is used :-D

If I correctly remember, you have to use a DEM with bathimetry and dam, then the dam break is passed trough a raster with decrements of dam height (it is use to calculate the new DEM after the dam breck by DEM - BREAK).

Best,
Maxi

2017-08-30 10:44 GMT+02:00 Codrina Maria Ilie <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    Hi Anna,

    You were perfectly right!
    I changed from null to 0 and it works.

    Thank you!
    Codrina


    On 29/08/2017 00:05, Anna Petrášová wrote:

        Hi,

        On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Codrina Maria Ilie
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hi all,

            I have been trying to run GRASS7 module r.damflood using the
            following
            datasets:
            
[https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B2Yx_1shUSx3VThlY3BrV1JyWjg?usp=sharing
            
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B2Yx_1shUSx3VThlY3BrV1JyWjg?usp=sharing>],
            with this command:

            r.damflood --overwrite --verbose elev=dem lake=water_depth
            dambreak=dam_breach manning=manning tstop=3 deltat=1
            h=b_depth vel=b_vel
            hmax=b_mwd vmax=b_mwv imax=b_mi wavefront=b_wf

            To make it easier, the lake has a constant depth.

            As far as I can understand, the rasters should be correctly
            built, but the
            outputs of r.damflood are obviously wrong (rasters with
            nodata or one
            category = 0; at second 1 the depth raster is half the
            lake's size (s00.png,
            s01.png)and at second 2, it completely disappears).

            During the processing, I get the Courant-Friedrich-Lewy
            stability condition
            warning message.

            If I try to chose as computational method for initial
            velocity estimation,
            uniform drop in of lake or small dam breach, I get the
            following error
            "ERROR: Don't find the dambreak - Please select a correct
            map or adjust the
            computational region".

            Does anyone have an idea what could be the reason of these
            results, please?
            Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.


        Your water_depth should have 0 instead of nulls, I think that's the
        problem in your case. The stability condition warning probably means
        you should reduce your time step, on the other hand, it will
        take more
        time.

        Anna


            Cheers,
            Codrina






            _______________________________________________
            grass-user mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
            <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>

    _______________________________________________
    grass-user mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
    <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user>




--
*Massimiliano Cannata*

Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica

Responsabile settore Geomatica


Istituto scienze della Terra

Dipartimento ambiente costruzione e design

Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana

Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio

Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14____

Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09____

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

_www.supsi.ch/ist <http://www.supsi.ch/ist>_

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to