Ken Mankoff wrote > On 2017-10-20 at 18:22, Helmut Kudrnovsky < > hellik@
> > wrote: >> try to use v.in.ogr instead in a location with the original projection >> and then reproject it. > > If I import into its native projection with ~v.in.ogr~ it displays fine. > If I then reproject with ~v.proj~, data is once again dropped. > > ~v.in.ogr~ complained about overlaps, which I don't think should exist, > even if they are valid in theory. I am currently re-importing with > ~snap=1E-13~ as suggested by ~v.in.ogr~, but that is taking a few hours. > Anyway, it seems likely the reprojection won't work in this case either. > > I find it strange that QGIS handles this both instantly and correctly (at > least correctly based on a cursory visual examination). > > -k. QGIS doesn't use a topological data model when it displays such data; GRASS tries to rebuild correct topology when importing such data; that's may be the difference. Have you tried to reproject your data with ogr2ogr? ----- best regards Helmut -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Users-f3884509.html _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
