On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Ken Mankoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2017-11-10 at 23:37, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > > gdalinfo -mm your_raster_map > > I can post the full output, but I assume the part you are interested is the diff between the normal and the '-mm' option, which is: > > Computed Min/Max=0.380,inf > > Which are the values reported by ~r.info~. > > It may be a bug with the upstream producer. If inf is invalid, I can let them know.
inf is a perfectly valid number, meaning infinity. Unfortunately, a test for inf is only available with C standard 99, and I don't know of a manual test in C for inf (or -inf) to avoid C 99. The bug is in r.out.gdal, not testing for input inf values. Markus M > I have not seen mention of inf anywhere online (searching GeoTIFF, GDAL, or GRASS), but it makes it hard to search because INF is a file format. > > -k. > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
