Hi Radek, út 12. 6. 2018 v 11:06 odesílatel Radek Novotný <[email protected]> napsal: > I created a comparison of methods [1] which were mentioned. But > unfortunately, the results are still very different (at least from my point > of view). What do you think about it? What approach should be chosen?
look at *mean* values which are very close (except of r.hydrodem + flow_accumulation). Maximum values are probably just few pixels located at region edges. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
