On 13/07/18 09:51, marion-bru...@sfr.fr wrote:
‌Hello,

I am working on Windows and I tried using GRASS 7.2.2, GRASS 7.4.0 and GRASS 7.4.1 to see if there is any difference, but it is always the same.

I have a ratser map calleddec-juin
First I didr.clump input=dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618 output=test
to get the clumps
Then I didr.volume input=dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618 clump=test@1217_Interpo0618
to have the volume.


If dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618 contains your DEM difference, than you will have different values for each pixel and clumping the map will results in almost as many clumps as pixels. The clumps are meant to be used to delineate specific areas for which you want the volume. If you want the total volume of the entire computational region, you can just create a map with r.mapcalc like this:

r.mapcalc "clump = 1"

and then run

r.volume input=dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618 clump=clump

which should give you the total volume.

Ideally, the clump option of r.volume should be optional. You could file an enhancement wish on trac for that.

Then again, as Micha has already explained, you can get the same result simply doing

r.sum dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618

and then multply the result by the area of your pixels (ewres*nsres).

Moritz

The result I have is:

(Fri Jul 13 14:12:45 2018)
r.volume input=dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618 clump=test@1217_Interpo0618
Volume report on data from <dec-juin@1217_Interpo0618> using clumps on <test@1217_Interpo0618> raster map
Category   Average   Data   # Cells        Centroid             Total
Number     in clump  Total  in clump   Easting     Northing     Volume
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       1     -8.02       -72       9   191262.28  1222178.97 -22.59        2     -9.02      -622      69   191265.64  1222177.29 -194.78        3     -8.04      -394      49   191268.44  1222176.73 -123.30        4     -7.08      -276      39   191271.23  1222177.85 -86.46        5     -5.94      -427      72   191274.59  1222176.73 -133.75        6     -4.30      -275      64   191285.22  1222178.97 -86.09        7     -5.10     -2714     532   191288.58  1222174.50 -849.47        8     -0.60        -7      12   191221.43  1222177.29 -2.27        9     -8.95     -1030     115   191230.39  1222176.17 -322.31       10    -10.06     -1217     121   191245.49  1222175.61 -380.88       11    -10.93     -1956     179   191249.97  1222177.29 -612.34       12    -10.24      -645      63   191259.48  1222175.61 -201.92       13     -7.05      -621      88   191329.43  1222177.29 -194.28       14     -7.51       -60       8   191336.14  1222177.29 -18.81       15     -7.47       -30       4   191337.26  1222177.29 -9.35       16     -8.04      -322      40   191340.06  1222177.29 -100.63       17     -8.99      -108      12   191343.98  1222177.29 -33.78       18      4.98        45       9   191182.26  1222175.05 14.03
       etc
       etc
   24458     -5.50       -22       4   191397.13  1221585.50 -6.88    24459     -5.51       -33       6   191378.11  1221584.39 -10.34    24460     -5.52       -11       2   191380.91  1221584.39 -3.45    24461     -5.27    -30348    5764   191309.84  1221601.17 -9498.51    24462     -5.49       -38       7   191358.53  1221582.15 -12.02    24463     -5.49       -22       4   191363.56  1221583.83 -6.87    24464     -5.48       -11       2   191385.38  1221583.83 -3.43    24465     -5.49       -11       2   191387.06  1221583.83 -3.44    24466     -5.50       -11       2   191388.74  1221583.83 -3.44
    24467     -5.50       -22       4   191360.20  1221582.71
            -6.88
   24468     -5.92   -523187   88358   191241.58  1221675.00 -163750.63
(Fri Jul 13 14:13:03 2018) La commande s'est terminée (18 sec)

As you can see, I have nothing at the end of the command... But I know it is finished, because when I created the clumps it said that it created 24468 clumps.
Do you need any more information?


Thank you very much
De : "Markus Neteler"
A : marion-bru...@sfr.fr,"grass-user"
Envoyé: jeudi 12 juillet 2018 16:43
Objet : Re: [GRASS-user] calculate the volume of a DEM with r.volume
Hello Marion,

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:32 AM,  <marion-bru...@sfr.fr <mailto:marion-bru...@sfr.fr>> wrote:
 > Hello,
 >
> I tried using r.volume as you suggested.  According to the documentation it
 > is suitable for what I am trying to do.
 >
> However, when I use it, I don't have the "Total volume" line at the end of
 > the report, like it is shown in the documentation. I just have the total
> volume of each clump, but not of all the clumps... Has it ever happened to
 > you when using this command?

That's weird! Which version/operating system do you use?

 > in the command line
 >
 > I simply wroter.volume input=difference clump=clump in the command line


Here on command line:

GRASS 7.4.1svn (nc_spm_08_grass7):~ > g.region raster=elevation
GRASS 7.4.1svn (nc_spm_08_grass7):~ > r.volume input=elevation clump=geology_30m
  100%

Volume report on data from <elevation> using clumps on <geology_30m> raster map

Category   Average   Data   # Cells        Centroid             Total
Number     in clump  Total  in clump   Easting     Northing     Volume
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     217    118.93  86288828  725562   635325.00   221535.00  8628882798.63      262    108.97  21650560  198684   638935.00   222495.00  2165056037.02      270     92.23  63578874  689373   642405.00   221485.00  6357887443.53      405    132.96  33732662  253710   631835.00   224095.00  3373266208.59      583    139.35   3011288   21609   630205.00   224665.00 301128821.55      720    124.30    599618    4824   634075.00   227995.00  59961816.06      766    132.43    936791    7074   631425.00   227845.00  93679120.08      862    118.31   7302317   61722   630505.00   218885.00 730231746.74      910     94.20   4235816   44964   639215.00   216365.00 423581613.11      921    135.22   1693985   12528   630755.00   215445.00 169398523.05      945    127.24      1145       9   630015.00   215015.00  114512.03      946     89.91    365748    4068   639085.00   215255.00  36574833.85      948    129.02    112632     873   630185.00   215115.00  11263181.57
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Total Volume = 22351026655.81
... which looks ok.
Can you say a bit more about your system?
Markus


_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user



_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to