Nikos wrote:
>> Import using r.in.gdal, _without_ any of `-l` or `-a` and then I get the >> closest to the reported spatial resolution. Else, with `-a`, for >> example, the spatial resolution is not as close to the "original" one. >> Makes sense?
Markus M:
>what would be the output resolution and extends with r.in.gdal -a? >Generally r.in.gdal -a provides the best results.
Importing without `-a`:
import 360 degree EW extent is exceeded by 0.00019226 cells north=80.0223214291667 south=-79.9776823855556 east=179.977687153889 west=-180.022321429167 nsres=0.0446428582072328 ewres=0.0446428582072241 rows=3584 cols=8064 cells=28901376 datatype=CELL ncats=0
Importing with `-a`:
import_with_a north=80.0223333333333 south=-79.9634444444444
Markus M:
something went wrong here:east=179.945666666667east should be 180 - ew_res / 2 just likewest=-180.022333333333i.e west = -180 - ew_res / 2 I will investigate
Reported here https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3672#ticket.
nsres=0.0446388888888889 ewres=0.0446388888888889 rows=3584 cols=8064 cells=28901376 datatype=CELL ncats=0
Nikos
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
