On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Markus Metz wrote:

With only 58 points, you will not get a lot of spatial detail, no matter
what interpolation method you use. For example, using 58 points to create
a surface with e.g. 1 million points is a waste of time: there is simply
not enough spatial detail in the input. You can check, as you have done,
by changing the resolution of the current region for the output and
comparing the results. The only solution for more spatial detail is to get
more input points.

Markus,

  Thanks for the insight. Yes, there are too few data points for the size of
the area. So, I'll not use this map, but present a table of annual mean
values instead.

Thanks,

Rich
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to