Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote > Rich Shepard wrote >> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: >> >>> If you want that analytical extent matches your vector extent _and_ the >>> DEM >>> resolution, use g.region -a raster=DEM vector=yourvector. >> >> Helmut, >> >> I've read the manual and missed understanding that it can be defined by >> both >> raster and vector maps. >> >> I don't think this is necessary. I can set the region to the DEM and the >> MASK to the vector map so r.slope.aspect and r.flow will operate only >> within >> the mask regardless of the overall region size. Unless I'm mistaken about >> the function of the MASK. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-user mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > > As you mentioned in your mail above: > >>DEM resolution: 3 3 >>analytical_area resolution: 2.99763360 3.00134608 > > '>g.region vect=analytical_area res=3 -p' did not change the floating > >point > {values to integer 3s. > > Do you see your mismatch? > > If you do g.region vect=yourvector res=whatever it tries to close as > possible to the resolution, but it's not aligned with your raster. > > Some raster modules will issue some warnings or errors. > > Moritz gave you a good explanation about region settings, masks etc aorund > the end of last year. > > > > > ----- > best regards > Helmut > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Users-f3884509.html > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list
> [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user See here: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg36351.html ----- best regards Helmut -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Users-f3884509.html _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
