Hello lists (sorry for cross-posting), as GRASS 8 starts to look less Duke Nukem Forever (a.k.a. never), it is a chance to change some things in imagery part. Thus if you heavy relay on imagery part of GRASS GIS, please find some time to give small feedback.
GRASS 7.8.0 imagery groups gained functionality of fully qualified maps and thus could be used from other mapsets, still some issues popped up. #1 Should there be subgroups at all? There has been a call to completely eliminate subgroups [1] and stick only with groups. If you are using subgroups, this is the right moment to share your user story (and not hypothetical one!). #2 Should i.maxlik add its output to the group? Current implementation of i.maxlik adds classification result to the input group [2]. This prevents use of i.maxlik with imagery group from other mapset. I would vote to remove such feature. If you have a use case where such functionality is needed, speak now, or forever hold your peace. #3 Should signature files be handled similarly to raster colors? i.cluster, i.gensig and i.gensigset write signature files to imagery subrgoup. This is not possible if group is located in other mapset. My proposal — handle signatures as raster colours — signatures are always saved in current mapset. Thus signatures created for a group in other mapset would be not visible in other mapsets. Thank you in advance for your feedback, Māris. 1. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3440 2. https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/3525 _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
