Hi Jon, vector is much more work for me, but if the output is PDF or AI or SVG or something similar, it would be easier to print (no resolution limitations). I'll try to get the bitmap output working, haven't really thought it through though and I'm sure I'll hit some major snags somewhere along the line...
-- David Rutten Robert McNeel & Associates On Oct 6, 8:50 pm, Jon Kayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, > > I suppose i'm just desiring a bitmap output. My major wish would be > to be able to print the grasshopper interface in in similar ways to > the rhino interface. All I would be after for now would be, being > able to select paper size, and a theoretical model size so that it > would ensure that the text on the different components would be > readable on a specified paper size. This would allow for a way to view > the entire definition at once, which when they get more and more > complex becomes extremely difficult in the grasshopper interface. I'm > not sure what vector output would be, but that's really all I would be > after so I could plot out complicated definitions and be able to > analyze them and look for redundancy or errors, and to help clean and > edit my files. At this point I personally don't see a need or desire > to be able to edit them. At least yet... > > Thanks again, > -Jon
