Lisa, there's been another report on this. I'm looking into it now.
-- David Rutten Robert McNeel & Associates On Oct 14, 12:14 pm, Lk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't read through all the emails about the new version, so I may > have missed this, but did the way that functions output boolean data > change? I have been using the results from functions like ">" and "<" > to plug into scalar operators, and now I'm getting errors that there > aren't values, like the trues and falses aren't recognized as 1s and > 0s, anyone know anything about this or have an idea of how I could do > this as simply with the new version? > > Thanks!
