Yes please !!
in heavy definitions, it would be great to be able to set all the
slider as we want them before launching the calculation
such a Real-time toggle switch in the GH interface would be great !

and concerning switches between components: very good idea - but it
would also be great to be able to control more than one switch
simultaneously - like grouping some of them together, so that only one
click on them activates or deactivates several switches

maybe the simplest way of doing this would be to add an Active /
Inactive parameter to each component, so that the activity can be
controlled with a boolean value (and thus it's possible to control
with one boolean as much component you want)


On Jan 27, 3:41 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
>
> Interrupting between components is not very difficult, I can easily
> add a check for that. It is however very difficult to interrupt a
> single process (for example, meshing, or intersections, or closest-
> point computations). I can add an escape feature, but there's no
> guarantee that it will be instantaneous.
>
> What if I made it easier to suspend the solver from the UI? That way
> you'd have a single button somewhere that could be pressed and it will
> stop all solutions before they even start until you release the block.
>
> --
> David Rutten
> [email protected]
> Robert McNeel & Associates
>
> On Jan 27, 3:27 pm, urbansurgery <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Having got to a point where i have a quite complicated schema running
> > with accuracy of output being one of the changeable parameters it
> > would be good if there was an interrupt button or if the grasshopper
> > routines were to interrupt on pressing ESC. Akin to having the
> > 'respond to' both set to false.
>
> > Generally things are ok as they are, but with multiple procedures with
> > extensive data making an unwanted change when runnign in 'acurate'
> > mode can freeze up the operation for a while when I already know I
> > don't want the calculations to complete.
>
> > thanks,
>
> > jonathon

Reply via email to