Just save them as gh or ghx files using your current version. Grasshopper 0.5 and earlier will load wrm and save as ghx. We'll keep an old version of Grasshopper around in case you run into more wrm files that need converting, but this will become a time and effort intensive process once 0.6 hits the shelves.
My previous comment about the file not working wasn't an IO problem. Old gh and ghx files should read fine (if they don't, I'll fix it). The comment was about them working differently. The data matching logic has changed so you may have to tweak old files before they behave as before. -- David Rutten [email protected] Robert McNeel & Associates On Mar 10, 3:30 pm, baldino <[email protected]> wrote: > uh, good to know > > you said in a previous post that our actual ghx definitions might not > work correctly in the next GH version... > will you implement a "compatibility mode" or something... > or will it be possible to install the new gh along with the older > version ? > > On Mar 10, 2:56 pm, opposablethumbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there an easy way to convert a bunch of files? > > If not no big deal. > > > thanks. > > > David Rutten wrote: > > > The next version of Grasshopper will no longer support the *.wrm file > > > format. If you still have wrm files you should convert them now into > > > either *.gh or *.ghx. > > > > Support for this file format was intrinsic to many different > > > interfaces and classes and in the interest of simplicity I decided to > > > remove legacy IO code from the core plugin. > > > > -- > > > David Rutten > > > [email protected] > > > Robert McNeel & Associates
