Those definitely look good. Maybe the exclusion of a given index(es)
is with a slightly different charachter...something like
"{0;[0-4]<3>; 2}" where the <3> would exclude that index....that could
also have multiple values assigned to it as such "{0;[0-6]<2-4>; 2}"-Damien On Mar 21, 2:42 pm, David Rutten <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sound very interesting....I don't think in needs to add to much syntax > > to what's there for paths, but we'll see. The only thing that pops in > > my mind at this moment is a means of accessing the data via index at > > the end of a node....ex. {0;2;2} (0)...Maybe some ways to retrieve > > multiple branches or multiple indexes...and a few key words like > > "Last" or something. > > I was thinking of using something similar to string comparison like > wildcards or regexp. > > For example, you could write paths as "0;0;?;?;5" where "?" indicates > any integer. Or "0;1;*", where "*" indicates any amount of integers. > Or "0;[0-4]", where you can specify a valid range for path indices > (inclusive and exclusive) etc. etc. etc. > > -- > David Rutten > [email protected] > Robert McNeel & Associates
