Thanks for the suggestions! I wrote this one before upgrading to the latest - still a little uneasy with tree structures. (I also noticed my definition broke in the latest version... I'll have to post an updated version when I get around to it)
On Mar 26, 8:08 pm, visose <vic...@gmail.com> wrote: > Try using the new tree structure for dealing with U and V intervals > separately. It's much more comfortable now. Here for example, I'm > culling a bunch of V intervals without fearing that the U interval > list wont match properly in the Interval2 > component:http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/staggeredtree.jpg > > On Mar 26, 9:42 pm,Andrew<and...@heumann.com> wrote: > > > whoops, wrong image > > link:http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/surfbox.jpg > > > On Mar 26, 4:40 pm,Andrew<and...@heumann.com> wrote: > > > > Hey all - Thought I'd share a definition I'm working on that creates > > > staggered surface boxes. > > > > image > > > here:http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/centerofsubsurface.jpg > > > > Definition > > > here:http://heumanndesigntech.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/staggered-surface-b... > > > > Any feedback/ideas to improve the definition welcome!
