IHis Visose

The definition works if you delete the sort list component and replace
with a fresh one. But the last fonction component which returns panel
types still red colored. don't know why.  Anyway Its is beatiful. One
question though. Whats the use of the point component after the
surface evaluation?.

Thank you very much.

On Apr 2, 11:34 pm, visose <vic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very strange. It's got to do with the sort list component. Looks like
> a bug in the new input manager. The thing is i noticed it, fixed it,
> saved it and uploaded it again but it's still there. To fix it:
> Go to the sort list component, right click on it, go to input manager,
> delete the B input, add it again, and link the B output with the 'y'
> input of the expression component at it's right. If the bug persists
> maybe delete sort list component and add it again.
>
> On Apr 2, 8:47 pm, aloysius lian <aloysius.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Visose,
>
> > When I tried to open the defn, there was an error:
>
> > Output parameter Index[2] too high or too low for Component Sort List.
>
> > Any ideas?
>
> > Al
>
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Claudio <claudioarch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > HI Visose,
>
> > > Thank you very much. I will take a very good look at your definition.
>
> > > On Apr 2, 3:14 pm, visose <vic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Here:http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/flatpanels.ghx
> > > > There are probably alternate ways of doing it. I added the rounding
> > > > down of panel sizes. To use the panel tolerance slider: 0 will round
> > > > all panels to the nearest unit, 1 will round them to the nearest 0.1
> > > > unit, etc. In the previous example, setting this to 1 created 11
> > > > different types of panels without any noticeable difference.
> > > > There's also an "option B" that places the panels instead on the top
> > > > of the surface, on the medium position of the interval, this is
> > > > because if you place the panel directly over the surface, in convex or
> > > > concave intervals the panel will sit on the top/bottom instead of
> > > > aligning it's sides with the boundary panels.
>
> > > > On Apr 2, 12:03 pm, Claudio <claudioarch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi Visose.
>
> > > > > That sounds great. Can you post the definition plz. I really like to
> > > > > see how you do it.
>
> > > > > Thank you very much
>
> > > > > On Apr 2, 12:12 am, visose <vic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I tried to reproduce the ceiling in GH.
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/grasshopper3d/web/fosterceiling.jpg
> > > > > > It sort of looks like it, if they did it like this (they most
> > > probably
> > > > > > didn't), then it's very simple, but most of the panels have a
> > > > > > different size.
> > > > > > I just used the divide interval2 component on the surface, found the
> > > > > > centers of each interval, found the width (in the u and v 
> > > > > > directions)
> > > > > > of each interval to use as the panel size (along the center of the
> > > > > > interval, since the distances will vary) and placed a 'center box' 
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > the centers normal to the surface using the calculated width as x 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > y dimensions. If there is not much curvature and/or the panels are
> > > > > > small, most of the panels will have a similar size, so you could
> > > round
> > > > > > the panel widths down so you've got only x number of different 
> > > > > > panels
> > > > > > adding a little margin between panels.
>
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 6:34 pm, Claudio <claudioarch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I see what you mean I was completly wrong about the teatragon. So
> > > in
> > > > > > > this case all the panels used in fosters porject are flat and
> > > > > > > perpedicular to the curvature. Is that Right?
>
> > > > > > > Thank you again
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 1, 3:41 pm, David Rutten <da...@mcneel.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Tetragonal doesn't mean a square base. A tetragon is what you 
> > > > > > > > get
> > > when
> > > > > > > > you deform a rectangle. A 'regular tetragon' is what you get 
> > > > > > > > when
> > > you
> > > > > > > > skew a rectangle.http://www.mathopenref.com/tetragon.html
>
> > > > > > > > The angles and dimensions of each panel may still be different.
>
> > > > > > > > I think the main reason Foster picked this solution is because
> > > all the
> > > > > > > > panels are flat, which makes them cheaper (actually, I know
> > > that's why
> > > > > > > > they did it, because I spoke to them about it).
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > David Rutten
> > > > > > > > da...@mcneel.com
> > > > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 5:59 am, Claudio <claudioarch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Hello David.
>
> > > > > > > > > Glad you"ve answered.
>
> > > > > > > > > I dont really know if the panels are really identical. The 
> > > > > > > > > only
> > > fact
> > > > > > > > > that makes me think of that is an article in the detail
> > > magazine (an
> > > > > > > > > architectural german magazine) they explain that the panels 
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > Tetragonal, Which means that they have a square base (a ; a)
> > > and a
> > > > > > > > > different height (c). So iI'm guessing that at least the 
> > > > > > > > > panels
> > > are
> > > > > > > > > identical y the x & y axis.  Otherwise as architect my self, I
> > > know
> > > > > > > > > that curved surface are very difficult to populate with a
> > > single panel
> > > > > > > > > solution, but is this solution that we all try to acheive.
>
> > > > > > > > > Anyway I'll continue my research. If you have any more ideas 
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > how to
> > > > > > > > > acheive this just  keep me posted plz.
>
> > > > > > > > > Thank you
>
> > > > > > > > > On Mar 31, 4:03 pm, David Rutten <da...@mcneel.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Claudio,
>
> > > > > > > > > > how do you know the panels in the Foster design are all
> > > identical?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Panelling with identical panels is a very complicated area 
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > geometry. There are a number of obvious solutions:
>
> > > > > > > > > > - rectangular, triangular and hexagonal planar grids)
> > > > > > > > > > - icosahedrons and other platonic solids
> > > > > > > > > > - singly-curved surfaces with rectangular panels (this one
> > > only works
> > > > > > > > > > for identical panel shape, not joint-angle)
> > > > > > > > > > - special cases where the underlying surface is a direct
> > > emergent
> > > > > > > > > > result of the panel geometry (for example penrose tilings)
>
> > > > > > > > > > And then there are weird special cases.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I found that many architects/engineers who face a
> > > facade-panelling
> > > > > > > > > > problem don't even try and come up with a single panel
> > > solution.
> > > > > > > > > > Instead, they try and minimize the number of different 
> > > > > > > > > > panels
> > > they
> > > > > > > > > > need to build the whole shape more or less accurately. This
> > > is always
> > > > > > > > > > a per-project problem that requires a per-project solution.
> > > Sometimes
> > > > > > > > > > they'll even design the panel and the underlying surface at
> > > the same
> > > > > > > > > > time, which gives you much more possibilities for solutions.
>
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > David Rutten
> > > > > > > > > > da...@mcneel.com
> > > > > > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 31, 12:23 pm, Claudio <claudioarch...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi David,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please be more specific, In which cases this can 
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > possible?
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm also iterested in diving a surface with identical
> > > panels. Please
> > > > > > > > > > > refer to this article for an exemple :
> > >http://www.detail.de/rw_5_Archive_En_HoleArtikel_5990_Artikel.htm
> > > > > > > > > > > And the architects website :
> > >http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Projects/1276/Default.aspx
>
> > > > > > > > > > > In this case the roof has been divided with a glass pane
> > > responding to
> > > > > > > > > > > a very simple rule called Tetragonal crystal system.
> > > (http://
> > > > > > > > > > > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetragonal_crystal_system).  I guess
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > curvature of the surface is a critical parameter in this
> > > case.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I'll be more then happy to continue this subject
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you all
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 30, 4:06 pm, David Rutten <da...@mcneel.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Steve,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > creating a filling pattern with identical panels is only
> > > possible in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > very small subset of cases.
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's also impossible to create a closed pattern of
> > > hexagons on a
> > > > > > > > > > > > freeform surface, unless you allow the hexagons to be
> > > non-symmetrical.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > David Rutten
> > > > > > > > > > > > da...@mcneel.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > Robert McNeel & Associates
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2:35 am, Steve Townsend <
> > > stownsend_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, I am very new to grasshopper and beginning to get
> > > my head around
> > > > > > > > > > > > > how to do things.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The main thing I am trying to achieve is a curving
> > > surface made up of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a hexagonal grid (or even better equillateral
> > > triangles) that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > redefines itself when the surface changes shape.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > An example of the sort of thing i wish to achieve:
> > >http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pYWndsXyWeQ/Sb3_MS2utmI/AAAAAAAAChw/Z7dZW1y...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I have followed the diagrid and panelling tutorials in
> > > the primer but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to create a grid where all panels are of
> > > identical size.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please could someone point me in the right direction 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > a way in which
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I might achieve this? Does anyone know of any 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tutorials
> > > along these
> > > > > > > > > > > > > lines?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve Townsend- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to