I just wanted to post a slightly optimized version of the magnetic field definition you used, since I've seen many people using it. I changed very little, but made it independent of the number of points. This way if you want to add more points there's no need to add a whole branch of components, the definition stays the same. If you want all the points to behave the same, just add them to the point parameter and delete all the sliders connected to the merge component except one. If you want each point to behave differently, add one slider per point to the merge component: http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/magfield_num_point_independent.ghx
On Apr 20, 1:36 pm, Tudor <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I've just started using grasshopper for a while and i've been working > on a pattern that uses cullpattern in order to rotate the geometry > according to the distance to a specific point, and attractors/ > repulsors in order to scale them up or down according to the distance > to them. > > This is the > file:http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/Magnetictry008.ghx?gsc=IKGa... > > My problem is that i couldn't find a way to get the result to be > homogene (what i want is that the inbetween values of the boxes are > similar, so that you don t get to see rows throughout the pattern) > > If anyone could help in any way, it would be great. > > Thanks
