Looking good Yes, the connection with principal curvatures of surfaces is really a very interesting aspect of these conformal mappings. Sawako and Panagiotis (http://www.sawapan.eu/) from AKT made a hugely impressive presentation of some of this kind of thing at the recent Shape to Fabrication.
On Apr 30, 9:35 pm, enrique <actg.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: > HI Daniel > thanks a lot for your last vimeo!! it's pretty yummy.. > for the momment i'm having fun trying on my own, in a definition > based on your magnetic displacement.. > with a starting VB > node..http://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/streamlines.JPG?gsc=dipLEgs... > still to get improved.. > some topological remesh in mind..( based in streamlines XD) > have you seen this?ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/prisme/alliez/anisotropic.pdf > > On Apr 26, 5:10 pm, Dan <danielpi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Cool stuff Enrique. > > > I think some of the most common techniques for this type of thing are > > the Euler, Verlet and Runge-Kutta methods (roughly in order of > > increasing accuracy and difficulty). > > > In the simplest case of the Euler method you simply take thefieldvectorat a > > point, move along it, then take the newvectorat that > > point and so on. > > The problem with this is that errors quickly build up, which the more > > advanced methods adjust for in various ways. > > > There are lots more variations within and aside from these, all of > > which make various trade-offs between accuracy and speed. > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_ordinary_differential_equations > > > On Apr 26, 12:18 pm, enrique <actg.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > Oh thanks Dan! > > > > i just tried something very quick..from your > > > definitionhttp://grasshopper3d.googlegroups.com/web/streamline.JPG?gsc=92g-gQsA... > > > i'lll try to do it properly using a vb script..
