Alexios Zavras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > could the list of examples on the end of the concise definition > be expanded to include a non-computer-based artifact ? > e.g., is an artifact of fiction (story, fairy tale, ...) acceptable > in the constructionism world ?
Yes: gears. Seymour reports that gears are the artifacts he has been using to build his own mathematical knowledge. He translated every math-problem into a gears-problem and soon, because he loved gears and because he knew how to manipulate them, he also learned a lot of mathematics. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Grassroots mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/grassroots
