On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 19:20 +0200, Moritz Lennert wrote: > On 03/08/07 19:05, Brad Douglas wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:57 +0200, Maciej Sieczka wrote: > >> Markus Neteler wrote: > >>> Maciej Sieczka wrote on 08/03/2007 12:21 PM: > >>>> Ravi, are you referring to the fact that there is no generic 32bit > >>>> binary GRASS package on GRASS website, but only 64bit? > >>> If so, I don't know how to generate 32bit binaries on a (pure) 64bit > >>> machine as the GRASS server is. A way out would be that a community > >>> member auto-generates 32bit Linux binaries which I then auto-fetch > >>> every week. > >> Hi > >> > >> After some reading I must say I'm to ignorant in this regard and won't > >> help much. If anybody is willing to take on this, I found 2 usefull > >> resources: "building 32bit app on 64bit system" [1] and "How to build > >> 32-bit Wine on a 64-bit (x86-64) system" [2]. The latter is about Wine, > >> but it gives detailed instructions for several main distributions, > >> which could help. > >> > >> [1]http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=570955 > >> [2]http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit > > > > export CFLAGS="-m32..." > > > > However, I fail to see the usefulness of 32bit GRASS on 64bit systems. > > The question was whether Markus could use his 64bit server to > cross-compile binaries for 32bit systems or whether someone with a 32bit > system would have to do it.
Ah. Okay, I misunderstood the question. Yes, it is possible to compile 32bit on 64bit. I don't do it simply because I hate to co-mingle bit depths, but that's a personal choice. -- Brad Douglas <rez touchofmadness com> KB8UYR/6 Address: 37.493,-121.924 / WGS84 National Map Corps #TNMC-3785 _______________________________________________ grassuser mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grassuser
