Thanks for your replies!
@Dimitri your ruby script rocks! Thank your for that :)
@Kay Sorry, I forgot to check the Git repo. I will check the benchmark out 
and test a bit around :)

Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014 12:23:44 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitri Stoljarov:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been using this ruby script for generating dummy apache-style logs (
> http://dimka.ee/foo/gen.rb).
> In last line of script (LogGenerator.new(ipgen).......) you can set number 
> to how many event per second you want to generate (currently it's 10 
> msg/sec).
>
> You can customize this script to have any type/size of logs.
>
> regards,
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:20:38 PM UTC+2, Volgger Markus wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read that the Graylog 0.20 RC1 was released.
>> Now i will begin to test my new Graylog2 infrastructure for stability and 
>> performance.
>> Performance is the reason why I'm asking.
>> I googled a bit and couldn't find any benchmark utility, that can 
>> generate enough messages to bring my infrastructure to their limit.
>> What i found was a simple bashscript, that generates about 1200 msg/s 
>> running on my Intel Core i7 with 8 threads/instances of the same script at 
>> 100% CPU load. The sad thing was, my Graylog2 Server running on a Intel 
>> Core i5 used about 20% to parse the messages. Of course i can multiply 1200 
>> msg/s by 5, but under heavy load, services will steal each other CPU cycles 
>> and in the end effect the server will probably be much slower than 
>> originally 
>> calculated.
>>
>> I think for someone, exactly as me, who will prepared to an increasing 
>> amount of logs caused by an expanding webserver infrastructure or a DDOS, 
>> will need such a utility.
>> What I imagine is an utility, that generates messages with different 
>> lengths, different error levels and so on.
>> A additional feature that would help to keep the indexes clean, is that 
>> Graylog2 server will automatically generate a temp index for the benchmark. 
>> The advantage is that you could simulate real load with sequential disk 
>> iops, your existing indexes will not be touched and for statistic nerds, as 
>> me, the message counter would not be distorted.
>>
>> Please let me know, if there exist an utility that I've overlooked and if 
>> such a utility will be developed by Company behind Graylog2.
>>
>>
>> Cheers :-)
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"graylog2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to