Hi, I used gelf input with previous releases (0.9.x and 0.12.x) and I needed to search with underscore in universal search bar. So I thought its the same with 0.20.x.
And I mean "New 0.20.x does now store extracted fields *without* an underscore (_)." Sorry for confusion :) Thanks. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kay Röpke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > The GELF spec says to prefix additional fields with an underscore, > http://graylog2.org/gelf#specs, yes. > When searching you simply omit the underscore, they are simply an artifact > of the transport mechanism during sending. > The graylog2 server removes the underscore when storing the message what > gives you the idea that the underscore is stored? > > Best, > Kay > > On Friday, January 24, 2014 9:43:45 AM UTC+1, Rahman Duran wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> New 0.20.x does now store extracted fields with an underscore (_). So >> what is the status of gelf input additional fields? Does it still uses "_" >> for additional fileds? If yes then how does 0.20.x handle the searches? Do >> we need to search with underscore or not? >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "graylog2" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/graylog2/EMGhgOseZzQ/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Rahman Duran Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi, Bilgi İşlem Daire Başkanlığı [email protected] [email protected] Tel: 0 466 215 10 00 - 1076 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "graylog2" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
