Do you have experience with other, "non-udp" inputs? I tried the TCP one and seemed fast.
El viernes, 14 de febrero de 2014 05:08:23 UTC-4, Martin René Mortensen escribió: > > Im with you, just be aware of its shortcomings and you will do fine. I > recommend you keep your logging architecture, its good and effective for > now. > > I dont know details about archiving - I archive to /dev/null myself - but > you could dump an index in any format you wish with some lines of code in > your favourite language - or even with a few well constructed curl commands. > > There is a feature ticket in graylog2 for using Grok filters, which is one > of the strenghts in logstash - if that gets implemented it should get much > easier to do field extractions and your need for logstash might disappear - > I just hope performance wont suffer overly much. > > On Friday, 14 February 2014 01:23:11 UTC+1, GambitK wrote: >> >> I like logstash flexibility in input, oputput types and powerful data >> manipulation capabilities. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "graylog2" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
