hi Kay!

Thanks a lot for your reply. I sent you email with the changelog and 
suggestions.

regards,

Asad


On Wednesday, 11 June 2014 07:40:26 UTC+9, Kay Röpke wrote:
>
> Hi Asad! 
>
> I would be greatly interested in your plans and/or code around these 
> areas! 
> Of course we are very happy to accept contributions and are very 
> grateful for any work that your team is willing to put into graylog2. 
> Please feel free to contact me at [email protected] to schedule a time to 
> talk about your proposed changes, or I'm also happy to discuss these 
> on the mailing list, of course. 
>
> If you could point me to a github repository, I'm more than happy to 
> review any changes you have! 
>
> Many thanks, 
> Kay 
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Asad Mehmood <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > graylog2 v 2.20 is great with a lot of new features and it's a lot more 
> > stable than previous one, Though we modified the old source code but 
> before 
> > we could commit it back to graylog2 the new version was released, 
> however we 
> > are forked again the latest version and once the developer finishes we 
> will 
> > commit it back to graylog2 git repository. 
> > 
> > There are few changes that we would like to do to graylog2-server and I 
> > would really appreciate if the authors can help us guide so instead of 
> > wasting time on finding the right place to change we can proceed with 
> change 
> > quickly. 
> > 
> > 1. currently New Elasticsearch index is created when a certain number of 
> > documents are inserted in index, we would like to give users two options 
> in 
> > config. 
> > 
> > 
> > elasticsearch_index_close_cond: {count, time} 
> > 
> > if count 
> > elasticsearch_max_docs_per_index = N 
> > 
> > if time 
> > elasticsearch_index_close_interval = (1d, 1w, 1m) 
> > 
> > 
> > 2. IF possible we would help graylog2 team by adding Routing option for 
> ES, 
> > currently we experience the issue of balancing between cost of operation 
> and 
> > duration of logs we want to keep in our system, we are looking for an 
> option 
> > where the latest 1 week logs stay in high I/O performance nodes and old 
> one 
> > moves to low performance I/O. 
> > 
> > any guidance from the graylog2 team will be highly appreciated in this 
> > regard. 
> > 
> > 3. Scheduled report delivery. 
> > 
> > 
> > thanks 
> > 
> > Asad 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "graylog2" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"graylog2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to