пятница, 24 июля 2015 г., 14:11:38 UTC+3 пользователь Jochen Schalanda написал: > > Hi Eugene, > > the index cycling/rotation and the index retention are two separate > processes. This means that old indices are not automatically deleted (which > is your current retention strategy) when an index cycle occurs. > > Are there any error messages in your Graylog server logs? >
I did not see any error messages, but I see 'skipping index retention checks' message. Maybe index retention process is stopped? There are no [IndexRetentionThread] messages except above. > > > Cheers, > Jochen > > On Friday, 24 July 2015 12:08:18 UTC+2, Eugene Prokopiev wrote: >> >> Due to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/graylog2/Won5E6G9WJI I >> tried to add extra debugging for IndexRetentionThread, but I see only: >> >> 2015-07-24T12:00:12.195+04:00 INFO [Periodicals] Starting >> [org.graylog2.periodical.IndexRetentionThread] periodical in [0s], polling >> every [300s]. >> 2015-07-24T12:00:12.196+04:00 INFO [IndexRetentionThread] Elasticsearch >> cluster not available, skipping index retention checks. >> >> It is very strange because elasticsearch cluster works and messages are >> saved in it. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "graylog2" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
