Hi, So the remaining step is to make the Extractors available thru the > marketplace then.
No, since extractors can be exported and imported using content packs, there won't be a separate category for this in the marketplace. Cheers, Jochen On Monday, 7 September 2015 21:36:48 UTC+2, frpet1 wrote: > > That's nice. > > So the remaining step is to make the Extractors available thru the > marketplace then. > And it sounds like that's on the roadmap too? > > Re, > /P > > On Monday, September 7, 2015 at 5:41:15 PM UTC+2, Jochen Schalanda wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> there's a rating function on the new Graylog marketplace ( >> https://marketplace.graylog.org/) which has been built for exactly this >> purpose. >> >> Cheers, >> Jochen >> >> On Monday, 7 September 2015 17:24:30 UTC+2, frpet1 wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently tired to use a Extractor from the repository, and, it didn't >>> work well. >>> >>> There is no way of voting (or "like-ing") or commenting on the >>> Extractors in the repository, which I think might be a good way of >>> "marking" Extractors as useful / working (many votes (or "likes") ) or >>> comments then they don't seem to perform as expected for Graylog version >>> foo... >>> >>> That would save us from having to trail-n-error thought the available >>> Extractors (and show what needs fixing / updating) >>> >>> Re, >>> /P >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/a840250f-da7d-4eb5-bb55-e3e32519b8fa%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
