Hi Linwood, the processor pipelines and its rule language are supposed to replace Drools, extractors, static fields, and possibly stream rules in the long run.
Cheers, Jochen On Monday, 1 August 2016 22:28:33 UTC+2, Linwood Ferguson wrote: > > And by the way -- rearranging the order made the pipeline I had set up as > a test work fine, so I did get by that. But still curious where these > should be viewed in the greater context, what they should be considered to > replace (if anything) for someone with no legacy to migrate? > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:55:19 PM UTC-4, Jochen Schalanda wrote: >> >> Hi Linwood, >> >> you can lookup and change the order of the traditional filters (such as >> extractors) and the new message processor pipeline in the web interface on >> the System -> Configurations -> Message Processors Configuration page. >> >> Cheers, >> Jochen >> >> On Monday, 1 August 2016 21:49:08 UTC+2, Linwood Ferguson wrote: >>> >>> If a pipeline is connected to the default stream, does that mean it runs >>> before the extractors? >>> >>> Have been experimenting, and I do not seem to see (and the simulator >>> does not show) fields created in an extractor associated with input source >>> when it arrives in the pipeline. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/ed503585-e0b7-404f-9a7c-6cf88e7ea017%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
