Hi, currently the extractors are still more performant than the message processing pipeline. In future releases, we'll work on bringing the message processing pipeline to the same speed as the extractors and then we'll phase out the extractors completely.
For current production systems, it's probably still useful to use extractors for performance reasons (and the code for extractors being much more mature than the code for the message processing pipelines). Cheers, Jochen On Thursday, 1 September 2016 13:40:45 UTC+2, AForton wrote: > > I've just read about pipelines and just found that they can do everything > that extractors can. So what is the use-case of extractors now? > > I thought that we could apply extractors before passing a message to > pipelines for more-specific processing, but I figured out that extractors > applied latter than pipelines do their job. > > So when is it better to use extractors? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Graylog Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/graylog2/a862b847-d051-4d9c-b577-9e1c46a48c86%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
