Thanks to Johan, I now have an even more reduced case in which the @exclude rule works! Namely, it is applied properly whenever there is no explicit @include * rule.
This still doesn't explain the earlier behavior I noted (variability possibly depending on the number and kind of iframes loaded at the target URL?). On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Erik Vold <erikvv...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Are there known bugs in the way exclude rules are handled?" > > No, there are not. If you think that you've found one, then please create a > reduced test case (a simple user script that demonstrates the issue) and > upload it to gist.github.com then submit a ticket for the issue here: > http://github.com/greasemonkey/greasemonkey/issues. > > Erik > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 06:37, Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all: >> >> I've found that >> >> @exclude http://metameso.org:9000/* >> >> works >> >> but >> >> @exclude http://li101-104.members.linode.com:9000/* >> >> doesn't work. This seems quite strange to me. Are there >> known bugs in the way exclude rules are handled? >> >> Joe > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "greasemonkey-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to greasemonkey-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > greasemonkey-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to greasemonkey-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to greasemonkey-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
