On 8 фев, 02:59, Lil Devil <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's telling that out of about 3 million active users of Greasemonkey, > we've only seen a dozen or so users complaining about this change. > That tells us that very few users (less than 0.001%) have a need to > edit the list of sites and/or pages a script runs on.
In fact it doesn't. You don't count all the people that silently rolled back to the old version, complained on local forums or saw complaints of others and decided not to install new version etc. There are 2270 registered people here, 3 of them (>0.1%) are complaining in this single thread. > So let's look at this another way. *Why* do these users need to change > the @includes? I change this for "Black text on white background" script. I apply it to sites that use white text on black background. Overall, the feature is used for scripts that don't target a specific site. And no, there's no better way for such scripts. If they had their own ways of managing sites (or parts of sites) they are applied to, that would be a mess I suspect. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
