> It would be pretty easy to write a quick script that would do the same > guessing that Greasemonkey itself does, and give you a set of lines to > copy-paste, in order to fill in this data for existing scripts. Would that > satisfy you? For now?
At this moment its not urgent, Greasemonkey detect API's very well and everything works fine, only a small popup maybe a little tease (informed of the missing grant declaration). Of course I can put grant line for all GM API's, no problem, but easy way will be write only @grant all :). If grant all obstruct the detailed declaration, I prefer the details. More detailed settings are always better than general. > I think you're trying to ask "will GM_xmlhttpRequest be going away?". The > answer is: there are currently no plans to stop providing any of the GM_ > functions. Not only XHR, GM_setValue and GM_getValue are very comfortable (cross- domain). I decide to use Greasemonkey because have that options, and I dont need anything on the server side (for easy data exchange) << Web Storage or Indexed Database API not allow this. So that I asked about supporting GM API in future, when whe have a big popularity of HTML5 stuff. But if you do not plan on abandoning GM API I can sleep safely. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
