On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got 38 scripts that I would have to go through each one-by-one to > make them compatible with Greasemonkey 1.*, which at the moment I don't > have the time to do (and didn't when GS 1.0 was first released).
Have you had time to even try once, in the past nine months? > Almost all have simple function names that might conflict with functions > on webpages. Also, I @require jQuery in almost all these scripts, too, and > since most websites also use jQuery, I assume that this is a huge conflict > so I'd have to rewrite many of my scripts that use jQuery. > You misunderstand. Unless you explicitly assign to "window.something" the interaction with the content page is unchanged. If you use jQuery, yes, you might need a one-liner to keep it in the script's scope: http://www.greasespot.net/2012/08/greasemonkey-10-jquery-broken-with.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
