What problems exactly are you running into if you just try the naive
approach of running the script with @grant none and absolutely no other
attempt to patch things up? That is, no code injection, no nothing.
On 2015-01-26 10:34, Shadow wrote:
I am trying to understand how the |grant none| feature works in
greasemonkey from an addon point of view. I am creating a simple addon
that will only insert a userscript.user.js file into a page that meets
the url mask, but so far I am using a content script injection technique:
|
varsource=function(){<-Originalcode ishere->};varinsert
=document.createElement('script');insert.textContent ="("+source
+")()";document.head.appendChild(insert);
|
This works for my addon and with Greasemonkey as well (even if grant
is none), however what I want is to not have to use a script injection
technique and instead run the script on the page just like how |grant
none| does, no need to use |unsafeWindow| either. Simply run as if it
was a script that was loaded with the page itself.
I have tried looking for documentation that could explain how your
|grant none| works, but so far I had no luck. I am stuck with the
addon's pageMod + contentScriptFile technique and that's it. I also
tried reading your source code, but there is a monumental amount of
code which doesn't make it easier to understand the mechanism of grant
none.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"greasemonkey-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
