http://www.stopredfrogbeachclub.com/scott.html


Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

As a guidebook writer for Lonely Planet and an outdoors writer for 
the Los Angeles Times, I have had the great fortune of traveling to 
dozens of countries that had only recently begun to attract 
international visitors in great numbers.

In each of those countries, government officials struggled with many 
tourism issues. Among them was always the issue of how to protect 
natural attractions such as coral reefs and rainforests from 
developers seeking fortunes by building hotels, golf courses, 
swimming pools and other tourist amenities inside or bordering the 
natural attractions.

In Mexico, Indonesia, Vietnam and other countries, I have watched as 
greedy developers built with little or no regard for the natural and 
cultural harm they know their developments will cause. In every 
instance, the developers swore up and down that they were acting 
with great environmental sensitivity, and they often spoke of waste-
water plants and other systems they were going to install.

But in every one of those instances, those systems were insufficient 
and the developments ultimately took such an enormous toll on the 
surrounding wildlife that they stopped attracting tourists. After 
all, who wants to travel thousands of miles to snorkel a dead reef 
or to explore in a rainforest that has been gutted by bulldozers? 
Would you want to?

These developers speak of the investment they are making, but who 
really thinks they have Bocatoreños' interests at heart? Who really 
believes they give a damn about the people of Bocas or its 
environment. They are interested in one thing: making themselves 
rich. If you think otherwise, you don't know them as I do. And I do 
know them.

One developer I interviewed in Mexico who was building a 500-room 
resort near Cancun told me privately that he knew full well that his 
resort would within 10 years kill all of the coral and drive away 
most of the fish in front of his resort, but he said he didn't care 
because the resort would pay for itself within five years and over 
the next five he would become a very rich man.

I have met with many such men and I have spent time with these Red 
Frog developers. They are no different. 

But one need not visit dozens of island chains like Bocas del Toro, 
as I have, to see what the Red Frog development will do Bastimentos 
Island. One has only to look at what the developers have done so far 
to see how environmentally insensitive they are. One need only ask 
the Bocatorenos they have hired to learn of their concern for 
Bocatorenos. One need only look into their dealings on Bastimentos 
to see that the developers tried taking things they had no right to 
take.

Visit the site these days, as I recently did, and you see enormous 
earth-moving machines carving up and running over wildlife as if it 
wasn't one of Panama's greatest national treasures. Does anyone 
think the tourists will continue to come to Bocas if Bocas waters 
have no lovely fish to see, no coral to marvel at, no red frogs to 
watch with delight?

There's something else to ponder, and it is this: The Red Frog 
development is not a tourist project in the conventional sense. It 
is being marketed to people who won't be coming to Bocas on 
vacation, spending lavishly in restaurants and bars and on boatmen 
and guides. Red Frog is a residential development being marketed to 
people who live on a budget. So while they will be contributing to 
the area's environmental problems with their garbage, air pollution, 
and human and toxic waste such as bleach and other cleansers, the 
people who live at Red Frog will contribute very little to the local 
economy.

And if you were born in Bocas and remember strolling Red Frog Beach 
in your youth, hold on to those memories because you can be certain 
your future access to Red Frog Beach will be denied. This is what 
happens, as I've seen many times before in many countries: The 
development goes up and the management says there have been thefts 
of guests' belongings. The management says "outsiders" - that is, 
people who don't live at Red Frog - must not be given access to the 
beach anymore because some are thieves and steal from the Red Frog 
residents. And with the right encouragement, management's complaints 
are heard and the beach is off-limits to people who visited it all 
their lives.

I have seen this exact thing so many times. In the Dominican 
Republic, where beaches are also supposedly open to everyone, guards 
with shotguns confront people who don't have an ID indicating they 
are a guest of the local resort. Several times I was confronted this 
way. Don't think it cannot happen at Red Frog. 

If we are honest, we will recognize that ANAM officials do not have 
the benefit of seeing the past work of developers like the Red Frog 
people. ANAM officials don't have the benefit of seeing firsthand 
how hollow are the claims of these people. They don't know that 
developers such as these are experts at saying what officials need 
to hear and the skirting or altogether abandoning their contractual 
obligations.

If we are honest, we will also recognize that the very reason these 
developers are here in countries such as Panama - that is, in 
countries that are eager to attract foreign visitors - is because 
they know they can take liberties with Panamanian environment laws 
and with officials that they could never take in their homelands. 
And they count on the stupidity, the gullibility and the corruption 
of those officials to let them have their way with their projects.

If Panama in general (and Bocas in particular) is to protect its 
natural attractions, it must not let developers such as these have 
their way. Otherwise, 10 years from now the damage will be done, it 
will not be reversible, and those who brought the damage about will 
be far, far away and untouchable. The time to stop the damage is 
now, while it can still be fixed and before more damage can be done.

Most sincerely,
Scott Doggett






<*> To buy Marcus L. Endicott's new book: Vagabond Globetrotting 3: The 
    Electronic Traveler in the New Millennium, go to:
    http://www.lulu.com/mendicott

<*> To post a message to this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]
    {* Remember, it is important to include a descriptive subject line.}
    {* Please do not quote entire Digests or long messages in replies!}
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/green-travel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to