Now we add "local" travel to the growing list. Help me flesh out the rest. 
There are the following that occur to me without much thought:

Ecotourism
Sustainable Tourism
Green Travel
Geotourism
Civic Tourism
Placed-based Tourism
Responsible Travel (Tourism)
Fair Travel

Beyond these "ethical" travel brands, there are those that focus on specific 
interests (at times, but not necessarily, combined with the ethic):

Nature Tourism
Adventure Tourism
Heritage Tourism 
Voluntourism
Experiential Tourism

I am purposefully ignoring certain niches such as agritourism and culinary 
travel (slow food, locovores), although I guess that they could be thrown into 
the mix.

At the ethics level, all work to:

>establish a more meaningful connection between the travel and the nature, 
>culture, and history of the destination;

>be sensitive to the local environment;

>be respectful of local heritage;

>and focus economic benefits on the local community.

What makes any of these different from the rest, other than brand identity for 
a group of nonprofits or brand ownership by consultants? I am interested in the 
significant differences, not those minuscule distinctions that are more 
semantical than substantive. Finally, why not simply agree on one brand for 
ethical travel (following the tenants that I outlined above), and focus more on 
how these might be applied rather than spend all of our time trying to conjure 
another cute logo and tag line?

In the US there are around 1 million nonprofits classified as 501(c)3 by the 
IRS. From 1998 to 2008 the number of 501(c)3 nonprofits in the US doubled. Here 
is the link for the details: 

http://nccsdataweb.urban.org/PubApps/profile1.php

This represents one nonprofit of this classification (and there are several 
others, like churches) per 300 men, women, and children who live in the US. 

Perhaps we could do without more nonprofits, and instead focus on how to make 
the ones that exist more effective. In the end, ethical travel will be measured 
by concrete, measurable results, not the volume of brands that pours forth.

Ted Eubanks


Reply via email to