Bush's Hitman At The World Bank

By Jude Wanniski
http://www.countercurrents.org/us-wanniski170305.htm

17 March, 2005
Wanniski.com

If you really don't know what the "World Bank" is all about, you would
think that President Bush was joking in nominating Paul Wolfowitz to
be the new president of the Bank, replacing Jim Wolfensohn. One of the
chief architects of the Iraq war, Wolfowitz is a political theorist, a
61-year-old man who spent most of his adult life at blackboards and
lecterns teaching students about international politics. He may know
how to operate an Automatic Teller Machine when in need of ready cash,
but he knows absolutely nothing about banking. Wolfensohn, who was a
New York investment banker before President Clinton named him to the
post a decade ago, at least knows something about banking. His partner
in New York, to which I suppose he will return, is Paul Volcker, the
former chairman of the Federal Reserve, our nation's central bank.
Wolfie the Warrior, by contrast, is the lifetime sidekick, even
prot�g�, of Richard Perle, probably the most important intellectual in
the service of the military-industrial complex. If you want to know
how Professor Wolfowitz got the job, follow the money.

That's what the World Bank is all about. It was created as an adjunct
of the United Nations at the end of World War II, along with its
brother institution, the International Monetary Fund. On paper, its
function was to lend money to developing countries to help them grow.
Its real job has been to serve the interests of the major money-center
banks and the multinational corporations who make the big bucks in
World Bank development projects. The Bank, which is really a "fund,"
persuades a poor country like Ghana, for example, to build a new
industrial complex in order make stuff for export. It will lend the
money to Ghana -- which it gets from global taxpayers including you
and me -- and arrange for the complex to be built by one of the
favored corporations in the military-industrial complex. The list
always includes Bechtel Corporation, Halliburton, and Kellogg Brown &
Root, a division of Halliburton. These outfits go in and build the
projects because the locals have no expertise.

In my January 23 memo in this space, "Confessions of an Economic Hit
Man," , I remarked on the recent book by John Perkins, who explains in
some detail the mechanics of this gigantic money machine. It not only
promotes unnecessary industrial complexes in Ghana, which rust away in
bankruptcy when they prove to be uneconomic. The aim of the
military-industrial complex is not only "industrial," but also
military. The name most closely associated with Halliburton, of
course, is Vice President Cheney, who was Defense Secretary in the
first Gulf War, with Paul Wolfowitz even then at his side (urging
all-out war with Iraq even after Saddam put up the white flag and
retreated to Baghdad before the war began!!) Rats.

The name most associated with Bechtel is George P. Shultz, once its
top dog, now a mere director. Shultz was Treasury Secretary under
Richard Nixon (helping talk him into floating the U.S. dollar),
Secretary of State under Ronald Reagan, and currently a member of the
Defense Policy Board, which until last year Richard Perle chaired.

Shultz also introduced Governor George W. Bush to Condoleezza Rice,
who in turn introduced Paul Wolfowitz to Governor Bush back in 1999.
Shultz of course knew at the time that Wolfie and Perle and their
neo-con Cabal were planning a war in Iraq, and we know nice, little
"doable" wars (Wolfie's word), are meat and potatoes for the
military-industrial complex. Instead of squeezing nickels and dimes
out of the taxpayers to persuade Ghana to build a steel mill it
doesn't need and can't run, even little wars run into the billions.
And everyone gets into the act. The arms makers who produce airplanes,
tanks, guns, jeeps and humvees get to blow up a country (like Iraq)
and Bechtel and Halliburton come in right behind to rebuild it. In
announcing the Wolfowitz appointment today, President Bush said the
World Bank is a big organization and Wolfowitz has experience running
a big organization, the Pentagon!! As far as the military-industrial
complex is concerned, Wolfowitz did a FANTASTIC job. He was only
expected to plan for a $30 billion war and he screwed up so badly that
it is now a $200 billion war, and counting. Anyone who can screw up
that badly deserves a promotion, to the World Bank.

So you see it doesn't really matter that Wolfowitz doesn't know the
first thing about banking or the economics of development projects. He
will sit behind the biggest desk at the Bank and take the telephone
calls from the Big Banks and the Multinationals, telling him what to
do, and providing him with experts like John Perkins, who did the
actual dirty work as an economic hit man, and now writes his
confessions. When the White House needs a big favor for one of its big
hitters, it need only put in a call to Wolfie, who will throw the
right switch. That's exactly the way it worked with Jim Wolfensohn
these past ten years, and if you don't believe me, look around and you
will note how many poor countries got poorer during his reign, and how
many big bucks were made at Bechtel and Halliburton.

There will of course be complaints from various global diplomats about
the obvious incompetence of Wolfowitz, just as there were puzzled
head-scratchings around the world about the incompetence of Condi Rice
as Secretary of State or John Bolton as UN Ambassador. But money talks
in all the places where the directors of the World Bank live, and they
will be advised to clam up by the local military-industrial money
machines. Perle will also have his pals at The Weekly Standard and Fox
News speculate that when Condi is President, Wolfie will be her veep
(which is how it happened we've seen talk of Condi for President in
2008). Nor can we expect any complaints from Congress, because in one
way or another there is too much money at stake, too many reputations
looking toward bigtime lobbying jobs when its time to give up a seat
in Congress.

If this seems harsh, as if I'm writing about something new under the
rocks on which our Uncle Sam perches, I suggest you read my 1978 book,
"The Way the World Works," which describes how the British Empire
worked in exactly this fashion. My best example was the first
multinational corporations, the British railroad builders. Once they
ran out of places to build rail lines in the U.K., they persuaded
Parliament to promote railroads in the colonies, and were enormously
successful in talking the Raj into criss-crossing India with railroads
in the mid-19th century. It was one thing in England, where the
companies could only build where there was a clear sign the line would
be profitable, because it was their own money at risk. In India, the
locals borrowed the money from the Bank of England and hired the
builders to put in rail lines that couldn't possibly be profitable.
India was burdened with debts from these schemes well into the 20th
century.

Even after it gained independence in 1948, India was persuaded by
British and American economists to keep tax rates high and to devalue
the rupee, to keep them poor and unable to compete with the big guys.
Who did the British and American economists work for? Why the World
Bank, of course, and also the IMF, whose job is to go into the poor
countries when they can't pay back their loans, and lend them the
money to do so -- as long as they agree to raise taxes again, devalue
their currency, and build new industrial complexes that are
constructed by Bechtel and Halliburton.

So you see why it makes perfect sense to have Wolfowitz at the World
Bank. He's terrific at doing wars, and wars are much more profitable
than nickel-and-dime industrial projects. That's the way the world
works. Always has been.

Reply via email to