The newly announced one rupee call rates of BSNL raises a lot on
concerns. I feel this is the first move india using communication
technologies to draw the nation state by washing out the regional
boundaries. Yesterdays hindu editorial addressed a lot of issues
related to it

All-India for a rupee
http://www.hindu.com/2006/02/13/stories/2006021304431000.htm

It has always been a successful ploy to lower the price of a product
to one rupee, because that is when the price tag is perceived to
resonate with value in the eyes of the consumer. Even elections have
been won on such a platform. In 1967, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
led by Annadurai, unseated the Congress from power in the then Madras
State for the first time in history by promising, among other things,
three measures of rice (roughly 4.6 kg) for just a rupee. It is a moot
point whether the DMK's representative in the current Union Cabinet,
Minister for Communications Dayanidhi Maran had any of that experience
in mind when he pushed zealously for telecom rates to be brought down
to a rupee. Never mind the units of measurement are different: the
rate for local calls in the new OneIndia tariff plan of the state-run
Bharat Sanchar Nigam and MTNL will now be reduced by about 17 per cent
to a rupee for three minutes, and for long distance calls by about 50
per cent to a rupee a minute. What is important is that the price tag
is lower — and about the lowest in the world. The reduction is even
more remarkable when one recalls the fact that even a decade ago, the
cost of talking across the country, say from Chennai to New Delhi, was
as high as Rs.36 a minute. There is premium to be paid by those who
wish to avail themselves of this low rate: rental is higher at Rs.299
a month and there will be none of the free calls offered in their
current plans. Those who do not use the phone much or call friends
across the country can opt to stay with their old plan. There need be
no losers.

Conceptually, the OneIndia plan is also one step towards making this
country a single unified market, where State borders are no barriers.
It does not matter anymore in which State you are and in which other
State your friend is, the price of the call is the same. Advances in
technology and refinements in the business model have collaborated to
bring about "the death of distance" in telephony. For some time now it
has been cheaper to call up a friend in the United States than one
across the border in Bangladesh. Ironically a call across several
hundred kilometres inside Uttar Pradesh has been at the price of the
local call, yet elsewhere a call to a town across a State border
attracted a high long distance charge. It is commendable that finally
State borders do not matter in the telecom map of this country. But
what cannot be ignored is that the infrastructure is uneven across
States, and in many of them even where it is available, it is poorly
patronised for lack of purchasing power. For instance, the rapidly
growing mobile telephone service is largely a facility for towns — the
population covered in 1994 was just 20 per cent — and rural India is
still to make it to the club. The challenge for the Government will be
how swiftly it can take the telephone service, now that it has become
cheaper and more affordable than ever before, across to the
underdeveloped parts of India.

--
The great moral question of the twenty-first century is: If all
knowledge, all culture, all art, all useful information, can be
costlessly given to everyone at the same price that it is given to
anyone
-- if everyone can have everything, everywhere, all the time, why is
it ever moral to exclude anyone from anything?
- Eben Moglen

Reply via email to