* Appointment of retired HC judges as chairpersons of SLSAs stayed *

Legal Correspondent

the hindu

http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/15/stories/2007011519221300.htm

* Such appointments made by States take away the power of High Courts *

------------------------------
* *
*States authorised to appoint retired judges without any upper age limit *
*``Sitting judge will exercise his powers more effectively'' *
------------------------------

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has stayed the appointment of retired High
Court judges as Chairpersons of the State Legal Services Authorities
(SLSAs).

A Bench of Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice S.H. Kapadia on Friday stayed
the notification empowering States to appoint retired judges to head the
LSA, on a writ petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association.

The association challenged such appointments by the States on the ground
that it took away the power of the High Courts.

M.N. Krishnamani, president of the SCBA, appeared for the petitioner.
Additional Solicitor General Gopal Subramanian appearing for the Centre told
the court that it was a serious matter and that he would look into it.

In its petition the SCBA said under the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987,
the Centre had stipulated that the Central Legal Services Authority shall be
headed by the Chief Justice of India as patron-in-chief and district legal
services authorities shall be headed by a serving district judge.

However, in the case of SLSAs, the notification issued under the Act
authorised the State Governments to appoint retired judges to the posts of
Chairpersons without any upper age limit.

The petitioner alleged that the power to appoint retired judges to the posts
of chairpersons was being misused by several States which were handpicking
retirees for the job, thus negating the object of providing free, fair and
affordable justice to the poor litigants.

A sitting judge would be a better person and he could exercise his powers
more effectively compared to a retired one, the petitioner said. The intent
of the Act was that the head of the SLSA also should be a sitting judge of
the High Court.

The first choice had to be a sitting judge in the alternative, a retired
judge could be considered. The State Government could not avoid a sitting
judge and go in for a retired one straightway.

The petitioner said it had learnt that in several States, there were
attempts to appoint a retired High Court judge of the choice of the ruling
party as Chairperson of the SLSA. Hence the present petition.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Ours is a battle not for wealth or for power.
It is a battle for freedom. It is a battle for the reclamation of human
personality."
- Dr BR Ambedkar
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala run by
Global Alternate Information Applications (GAIA)
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to