i welcome u to do it
On 30/09/2007, Sreejitha P V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/30/07, Ranjit Ranjit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The tragic disposition of the people who rule greenyouth has been that > > "personal attacks" divert attention from "discussion". They have > maintained > > it, though at times succumbing to the very logic they pretend to serve. > > Anivar, dileep, etc. hav shown at times to "personally attack in order > to > > prove their point and ideologically position against their opponent, > > difference is that anivar does it immaturely, and dileep, very > cunningly. > > However, I look at all these positions (including mine) not as attempt > to > > tarnish any one. > > what is urs? that of manipulation?Let's all have more deep introspection. > > rather the personality tangential drawn will help to pose > > question to the individual dispensations of ideology and how , by means > of > > its public display make persuading rhetoric. > > > > Many scholars have done such an attempt, of course not within the > > limitations of digitally-safe-guarded sacred place of listservs and its > > hegemonically moderated caste/religious/gender spheres. > > > > Martha Nussbum on Judith butler, > > > > Ambedkar on Gandhi etc could be sited as some such attempts..... > > > > > > > > Ajitha's piece "DILIP RAJINTE FEMINIST JADAKAL" really exposed the kinda > > patronizing agency narrative he tends to dispense at the expense of sex > > working community. What Ajitha did was looking at dilip and his position > > vis-à-vis the issues of sex workers, and ideologically posing questions > to > > it. Though I disagree with her ideologically, her posing of question > can't > > at any cost be branded as "personal attack". > > > > The kinda of impact ajitha's article created could not have been > possible > > with a similar but a politically correct analytical piece in a journal. > So, > > with all my difference, I appreciate her. > > > > At this moment, I would like also to appreciate the effort taken by > anivar > > (read his post-motrem mail on me in the previous discussion).. but would > > like to remind him tht , the very effort itself indicate the > "ideological" > > positioning of anivar against that of mine... and I ve only referred > this > > in one of my MODERATED MAILS. and that was not bz of "hate" at all. The > > effort anivar took was against his ideological opponent. He never > attempted > > to do the same for others (equally culprit of being diverting)..bz they > > never position ideologically against him. > > > > > > On the allegation of "diverting discussion" in chitralekhs issue:. > > I look at chitralekha issue not as an isolated incident happened in > kerala. > > There is a whole lot of hisorical,political,social,cultural > > elements that leads to such an incident. As such, my critique of the > > invisibility of issues of the discussion of caste in the cultural > spheres > > dominated by the avowed cultural leaders demanded a complex and detailed > > interrogation than an issue-based alliance formation. People who argue > for > > alliances tend to underplay the deeper concerns, sometimes immaturely > and > > many times very cleverly. This is the theoretical limitation of Dilip > raj > > and his positioning as well....not much to mention abt Anivar and his > > tantrums.... > > -- > > Ranjit > > > > > > > > -- > I eat meat."It was not that I felt myself turning into evil, but that > an enormous physical indifference, as vast as the whole abyss of light > at my feel, came to me: an indifference not only to the other man's > body scrambling and kicking on the ground with an arrow through it, > but also to mine" > > > > -- Ranjit --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
