*Tax the car, fund public transport *

*Bhanoji Rao *

None can deny the security one gets by owning a product instead of renting
it. This is more so for high-cost durable goods such as housing and
automobiles. Even those with low incomes have to spend fairly high amounts
of money and time on transport daily, to get to work and return and to send
children to school, for instance.

In addition, one makes several trips on a relatively non-routine basis for
shopping, medical assistance, entertainment and visiting homes of relatives
and friends. Most of the low income people depend on public transport, which
is often subsidised. They do not, however, enjoy the perceived convenience
of owning a motor vehicle.
Development Constituents

 There are certain common goods and services, which enter every person's or
family's perception about what constitutes development for him/them. *Roti*,
*kapda *and *makaan *have top priority within the framework of basic needs.
If each and every person desires and aspires for just the basic needs
satisfaction would be that much easier.

It is part of human nature that once the basic needs are met, other demands
pile up, driving the person to put in more effort to earn more. In line with
the growing purchasing power, supply catches up. The processes contribute to
economic growth at the macro level and 'happiness' at the micro level. Thus,
as incomes rise, demand for various goods and services increases
progressively in terms of both quantity and quality.

In the case of transportation, the progression is generally from renting to
owning, on the one hand, and from public bus/train to two-wheelers and cars
on the other. In the olden days, ordinary people used to rent a horse-drawn
coach or a rickshaw, while the well-to-do had one of their own to ensure
that their social and economic status was demonstrated, seen and respected.
These days, however, renting and ownership options have taken a great leap
forward as they apply to cars and even aeroplanes. Fed up with delays at
airports, top brass in business, and even in politics, purchase their own
aircraft and enjoy the comfort and save time.
Car Culture

 Henry Ford would not have imagined the widening and deepening of the supply
of and demand for cars even within the US, let alone the rest of the world,
especially China and India. Surfing the net, one would come acress such
statistics as automobile emissions account for more than one-fifth of green
house gases; there are a little over 230 million registered vehicles, and
each car on an average emits 12,000 pounds of carbon dioxide, the absorption
of which requires 240 trees. Despite the US accounting for only 5 per cent
of world population, its share in world automobiles is a high 30 per cent;
the nation contributes 45 per cent of the world's automotive carbon-dioxide
emissions.

According to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, in 2004, an average
American family spent 32 per cent of total expenses on housing.Car was next
in priority, taking up 17 per cent of the expenditure. Food came third with
13 per cent, and the other expense items accounted for a third.

For several years after Independence, India shied away from the car cult.
For instance, on an average, the motor vehicle output per thousand people
was less than one until 2000-01. Only in 2005-06 did it reach 1.5. Also, the
initial emphasis was on the production of commercial vehicles. Since the
late 1980s and early 1990s, there was a clear relative shift to passenger
vehicles (Table).

In the major cities of the world, car density is either close to one car for
two persons or less. For instance, per 100 persons, San Francisco (Bay Area)
and Paris (Ville de Paris) have 58 cars, while Frankfurt and Toronto have 50
each. India has a lot of room to catch up, especially in the urban areas.
Even if one assumes that all the 1.3 million passenger cars are in Urban
India, the car density will be 1.3 million out of about 300 million people
or one car for 270 persons. The fact that there is still large room for
rapid expansion of car ownership in India is a clear signal of what is in
store in the years to come: Clogged roads, emission-related problems and
road accidents, to name a few.
Ownership versus public transport

 The Public Transport Users Association of Victoria, Australia, has on its
Web site, put a note on the common urban myths about public transport. One
of them refers to the myth that those owning cars will not use public
transport. The fact, however, is that most people will continue to own and
use cars and resort to public transport when the need arises, as in the
European cities.

In the Indian context, there is this possible alarming scenario of public
transport becoming more and more expensive, totally unreliable and of low
quality, as car ownership rises, with ludicrously cheap cars and innovative
financing mechanisms. None should dream about a world without private cars
in the urban areas. It is utopian to expect the owners of cars to happily
give them up as countries promote a transport system comprising public bus,
mass transit rail, and taxi.

A government in pursuit of inclusion and equality must not be seen to
encourage car culture to the detriment of the common people, who in India
are the vast majority. Tax the car and fund infrastructure and public
transport should be the winning mantra.

In the next Buget, policy-makers would do well to levy a special tax on each
new car purchased, say, at 10 per cent of cost, to exclusively fund road
development and metro rail projects.
(The author, formerly with the National University of Singapore and the
World Bank, is a visiting faculty, Sri Sathya Sai University, Prasanthi
Nilayam. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] )

  **

(c) Copyright 2000 - 2007 The Hindu Business Line

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to