do we still need to cry for marxists, defeated revolution, swaraj..etc.? nostaligia can be stupid and lethal if it is not 'useful' in ur current activities and thoughts. socialism...what does it mean actually?
On 2/21/08, venukm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Socialism is no historic blunder > By V.R. Krishna Iyer > > > http://www.asianage.com/presentation/leftnavigation/opinion/op-ed/socialism-is-no-historic-blunder.aspx > > Socialists of India, unite! You have nothing to lose except a few > crypto-capitalist super-pragmatic Marxists. You have a creative > crimson destiny to gain and a billion-strong have-not humanity to win. > Why then, do you, comrades of Marxian vintage, hug capitalist > sorceries? With a plethora of Socialists, Communists, Marxists willing > to join the long march to "Purna Swaraj," our democratic republic can > become self-reliant without alien investment. But this prospect is > being debased by tycoons, "Westoxicated" investment-operators and > nascent neo-Marxist innovators who have surrendered to consumerism. A > dangerous class has thus emerged with the dominant doctrine that money > is more than man. The dazzle of globalisation, liberalisation, > privatisation matters more to them than the rights of women, children, > workers and peasants. > > Our culture of Swaraj puts humanity above commodity, sober, > enlightened values above greedy glamour. Gandhiji once wrote, "In so > far as we have made modern materialistic craze our goal, so far are we > going downhill in the path of progress." > > The hidden agenda of the capitalist North is to capture the resources > of India, debunk its socialistic ambition and turn it into a mere > marketplace and banana republic. The founding fathers of our > Constitution had on the other hand envisioned an economic democracy, a > socialistic polity, a people's sovereignty. > > My critique of the Marxist policy-novelty has to be viewed in this > background. The CPI(M), which wields state power, participates in > elections, sits in the House and tells its cadre to work for a > socialist transformation, is destroying its own foundational > militancy. India's human capital can outstrip the monetary investments > by the capitalist class which wants to rob labour from the jobless > have-nots and the deprived sectors. We want radical humanism and > revolutionary patriotism to pool all available talent and bring about > a social change for the happiness of the lowliest. Imperialism and > unbridled foreign investment have undermined the lot of our poor, > devalued our Constitution and sapped the very soul of our Swaraj. It > is a mistake to think that socialist transformation is an idle dream, > and that MNC big business is the only pragmatic strategy without an > alternative. > > Kerala and West Bengal have had Marxist governments for decades. > Capitalists, native and foreign, have had considerable hold over our > national economy; and for nearly 20 years the American pressure on our > country's governance has pulverised our noble traditions and social > grace. No serious socialist policy has been tried by any state. My > experience as minister, under E.M.S. Namboodiripad in 1957, convinced > me that people, whichever their party (or even if they do not belong > to any party), NGOs and bureaucrats are willing to toil free for > community development. Speaking generally, since 1991, the national > economy has been noxiously contra-Constitutional and anti-people. On > this, let me quote Shashi Tharoor: "India annually gets richer by $200 > billion. India's foreign resources have exceeded $140 billion. > Remember, the country had to mortgage its gold in London because the > foreign exchange coffers were dry! In the list of the world's > billionaires, 27 of the world's richest people are Indian, most of > them staying in India. A large portion of the world's poorest people > live in India too and you don't need to go to Davos to meet them. Our > country's poor live below a poverty line that seems to be drawn just > this side of the funeral pyre. 250 million people living in conditions > that are a blot on our individual collective conscience is too grave a > matter to be lightly dismissed (The Tiger Elephant, the Tiger and the > Cellphone, P-6) > > I was taken aback when Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, reportedly successful > as West Bengal chief minister, declared that he was running a > capitalist government. He thus ignored the fact that rural West Bengal > had developed as a great paradigm with people's participation and > socialistic perspective that were far removed from a feudal society. > And I was stunned when the great Jyoti Basu — the Marxist leader who > for long had inspired his people and many like me by his leftist, > simple genius — strangely reversed gear, jettisoned his party > fundamentals and abandoned socialism as impractical. The Indian > Constitution always had a socialist bias and the Planning Commission > had been set up to work out a socialistic pattern of society. Banks > were nationalised, big hydel and irrigation schemes were set up, land > reforms and urban land ceiling laws were enacted, public sector > industries were built. These were not capitalistic moves, but > socialistic. > > After all, Nehru, in the Constituent Assembly had asserted, "We have > given the content of democracy in this Resolution and not only the > content of democracy but the content, if I may say so, of economic > democracy. Well, I stand for Socialism, I hope, India will stand for > Socialism and that India will go towards the constitution of a > Socialist State." > > Many parties and Parliaments have governed the country. The words "We, > the People of India" and "Socialist Secular Democratic" have survived > all these years. Every President or minister ever in power, or judge > on the bench has taken his or her oath of office pledging to uphold > those very words of the Constitution which sustain our Republic. Jyoti > Basu and Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee took office after taking the oath to > uphold this "Socialist Secular Democratic" state. How can they now > betray it after gaining state power? It was perhaps anticipating such > future deserters, that Karl Marx in his letter to Engels had written: > "All I know is that I am not a Marxist." > > Please remember the Marxian mandate: "The philosophers have only > interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it." > > The only hope the Indian masses have is the socio-economic freedom > from feudal-colonial submissiveness. Will the Marxists renege on this? > > I am aware that a crimson economy will not be born tomorrow. > > But I am equally aware that a powerful cooperative movement, a > large-scale public sector, a just land ownership with limited ceiling, > a nationalisation policy, workers' organised farm policy and > industrial-marketing economy can today become a reality, given the > will and the vision. > > Do you have faith in people's participation? I have. Corruption has > ruined Indian politics. The capitalist alternative is > industrialisation, mafia menace, market racket, hospital terrorism, > hotel "star wars," slum slavery and freebooter robbery. > > Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer is a former judge of the Supreme Court > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
