yes Dileep is right and that s how this order s been designed pathetic!!
On 6/21/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As per the present order, yes. > The only section affected is adivasi women and dalit women. > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Anil Tharayath Varghese < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Ranju please clarify this doubt for me in the terms of intercaste >> marriage for example say a aadivasi man marries a Ezhava women. are >> the children entitled to get the benefits on the grounds of being a >> child of an aadivasi father in a patriarchal set up >> >> On Jun 21, 7:02 am, "ranju radha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > go to a govt office for a certificate. say for eg; a caste/community or >> > income. the officer will ask u to put ur father's name. they wont accept >> if >> > use ur mother's name .. >> > if u question them, the answr is ; "we live in a ptriachal soceity" >> > >> > as far as i know some subcaste organisations have raised voice against >> the >> > govr order initially. but r also not very active, perhaps bz of dalit >> > patriarchy >> > >> > the issue is of serious concern as it denies the woman, her parental >> role >> > denying a generation to her, >> > that too to a woman who has shown the courage to defie/break caste >> > codes/barriers >> > >> > in solidarity >> > >> >> > On 6/20/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Today, about hundred individuals participated in a convention held in >> Bank >> > > employees Union hall >> > > against the anti democratic order of the government issued on May 22, >> 2005 >> > > denying parent status to women >> > > in case of inter caste marriages. Convention was orgenised y MANUSHA. >> > >> > > K.Ajitha inaugurated the convention. Rekha Raj presented the issue . >> She >> > > wondered why the civil society is >> > > keeping a safe distance from this issue as if it affected only a >> minority. >> > > She also wondered why Dalit organisations are >> > > insensitive to this isssue. caste for dalit and adivasi women is not >> > > something could be erased automatically through marriage, she opined. >> Women >> > > should also be given the status of 'natural parent". >> > >> > > K.M.SalimKumar , Jyothi Narayanan, Rajagopal Vakathanam, M.B.manoj, >> Sajini, >> > > Purushothaman, K.Sadanandan, Adv.Anila George, Dileep Raj and Adv. >> Rashmai >> > > participated in the discussion.P.D.Jose presided. >> > >> > > A state level committee was formed with K.Ajitha ( chair person) and >> Rekha >> > > Raj, Anila George, Sasikumar Kizhakkedom (convenors) >> > > to lead future struggles. >> > >> > > -- >> > > Dileep R I thuravoor >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > > -- > Dileep R I thuravoor > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
