Hunter Better Than Nanavati

By R.B. Sreekumar

29 September, 2008
Countercurrents.org

The Nanavati Commission report deserves the description as a
whitewashing document of the aggressors than the conclusion of an
enquiry. This is an immature, partisan and inconclusive report which
has a political motive. It can only be seen only as a predetermined
script. The report hides the heinous acts of Gujarat Chief Minister
Narendra Modi and co, who were the perpetrators of the violence. This
is not a blind attack by me, but an analysis based on facts.

I am a police officer, committed to the Constitution, who has filed
four affidavits before the Nanavati Commission. Every commission has
the responsibility to analyse and probe the truth about the
information even if it is scribbled on a torn piece of paper. As the
report of a senior Intelligence officer in the state, my affidavits
have their own seriousness in the state where genocide (it would be a
big lie to history as well as to humanity to term the atrocities
unleashed in Gujarat as Hindu-Muslim riot) took place. Many things,
with proof, about the situations that led to the riots and the roles
of the senior officials in them have all been included in the report
submitted before the commission.

I have been threatened by Government Pleader Aravidn Pande and Home
Secretary Murmu that it would cause repercussions if I tell the truth
before the Commission. (Pande's poisonous hissings had been brought
before the people of the country by 'Tehleka'). I have even recorded
their speeches and presented before the Commission. The Commission had
the responsibility to verify the truth about them. The Commission
should also have recommended punishment for me had the affidavits I
submitted been false. Instead of this the Commission canonized the
perpetrators of the riots.

The Supreme Court has authorized a committee headed by former CBI
director Dr. Raghavan to probe into the incidents. It also gives rise
to a lot of suspicion about the submission of the Nanavati report when
their work is in progress. This report disappoints every citizen who
wants to see the rule of the law and secularism surviving in the
country.

Right from the start there had been flaws in the workings of the
Nanavati Commission. The Hunter Commission which probed the Jalianwala
Bagh mass murder had recommended punishment and demotion of the
British officials responsible for the incident. It is at once shameful
and dangerous to note that a probe held in independent, democratic and
secular India under a Justice is not even as honest as the Hunter
episode.

It will, in no way, be helpful to the people of India, instead, it
will foster insecurity in the minority Muslim community and also
create a mistrust in Muslims for the law and justice system of India.

This report has made Modi happy. BJP has also vociferously welcomed
it. Because it is a report against a community, which they want to
throw out from the country. Like Modi's men another group will also be
happy about the report: the nefarious forces which want to exploit the
discontent in the Muslim minds and attract them to become the pawns of
terrorism. However who doesn't know both these forces have the same
ulterior motive to exploit the situation created by bloodshed and
instability.



R.B. Sreekumar was Additional Director General of Police in Gujarat.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to