---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: mihir bhosale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/10/22
Subject: An open letter to Mr. Ratan Tata!

New Delhi.

18th October 2008

Dear Mr Ratan Tata,

This letter to you is in response to Mr Modi's letter to the Buddhababu and
yours to the youth of Bengal written over the past week. Sometime back I saw
full page advertisement in the Business Standard (2nd October, 2008,
Kolkata, pg 5) that extolled you to stay on in Bengal since you were the
hope of new Bengal and of its young persons. It was signed the Young People
of Bengal. I was intrigued by the page because it contained no marker of the
advertiser and no name of its printer. It was totally anonymous. But now
with your open letter addressed to the youth of Bengal I surmise that it was
your company that bought the space and published the anonymous
advertisement. Incidentally, the Business Standard was a paper that
published the almost scandalous deal that the government of West Bengal had
signed with your company and hence you perhaps chose the paper to publish
the advertisement probably in an effort to turn the popular opinion in your
favour. It is interesting how you have relied so much on popular opinion and
the media for a project that claims to be hard economics and technology. We
thought only democracy was run on popular opinion, it is heartening to know
that even businesses choose to be run by such means as well. If democracy
were to serve the cause of industry, nothing could be better.

I distinctly remember the time when you announced the one lakh rupee car
when I said to myself that the Tatas have now broken the price barrier in
the automobile industry. I soon read that you were going to develop the
hydrogen car and I swelled in pride at your marvel. I knew that if India was
to ride the crest of innovations it had to be through you. As a Bengali, I
have no faith in the Marwaris and the Gujaratis (they are mere banias) but
Tatas being established, respected and traditional, are the real
industrialists. Tatas are honest, transparent and responsible. I have been
to Jamshedpur and seen with my eyes how people, whether they are in your
steel plant or not swear by you. When I became a working and an earning
individual, I preferred Tata to anything else. Tata Eau de Cologne was the
only perfume that I used; I bought the Tata Indicom and installed the Tata
Sky. I am insured under Tata AIG, purchased Tata Steel shares and hence
greatly looked forward to the Nano, the Tata Car. I found the Indica a bit
heavy for my size is the Maruti 800, but the Nano, I imagined would sort out
that problem.

The Nano also meant to me something else. By locating the plant into West
Bengal, I felt that you were going to give a new economy, a new culture and
a new society to Kolkata. I was only twenty two when I left my home and my
parents behind because Bengal could give me no employment that would do
justice to my qualifications and the standard of living I inherited. Each
day of my stay of a quarter century away from home I have lived with the
dream of going back to Kolkata some day. Nano and the Tatas gave me hope of
that return. It was belying of the promise of homecoming that upset me the
most when you decided to move out of Bengal.

It was then really that I took a hard look at the Singur stand off and this
was also the first time in my life that I really noticed Mamata Banerjee,
the accused in your open letter. I have been so long outside Bengal that I
am out of touch with the details of everyday life in the state. Mamata, to
me, is one who is incessantly upsetting my travel plans back home because
she seems to call one bandh after another. But suddenly as you decided to
move out of Singur into Sanand and openly called the progromist Narender
Modi as the good M, and Mamata as the bad M, it was then something struck
me. I realized that notwithstanding Mamata was the bad M, it was pernicious
for you to have called Modi the good M, the man who has used political power
to sponsor riots and finish off his bad M, the Muslims. It was at that
moment that I started calling up people in Kolkata to find out what really
had happened.

I began first by reading through the details of the massive subsidies that
you were to get. So the people of the country and the state were helping you
with Rs 30,000 per car to maintain the Rs one lakh barrier. In days of
industrial competition, such subsidies are unethical and you could very soon
be put to question by the Competition Commission as soon as it is formed.

Then I looked towards Singur. I am familiar with that area and I learnt that
a piece of land was lying just across the road of an area of over 500 acres
which could have served your purpose. The only thing that you would have had
to do was to construct an underpass and things would have been solved. But
you insisted on the contiguous area of the 350 acres whose owners were
unwilling to sell land. When I visited the locality, your steadfast demand
of the land of the unwilling farmers became clear to me. The land was
irrigated and you needed water. So with land you were claiming water as
well. In any case, irrigated land is a precious thing in India and more so
in Bengal because of its high population density. I was quite surprised when
you insisted on such an irrigated land be given to you when you know that a
car can be manufactured anywhere but food crops cannot be grown in any
place. What lay behind your obstinacy was puzzling to me. I imagined that
with your stature you should have at least gone half way with the farmers
and helped Buddhababu to abandon the acquisition of the 350 acres and
instead settled with the underpass alternative. For you, the compromise
would have hardly cost you anything, for the farmers it meant their lives.

As a child I read Tagore's poem *Samanya Khoti* in which the queen of a
kingdom burnt down shacks of the poor people because she wanted to dry
herself after a cold bath in the river, I felt that you were like that queen
reveling in your own glorified self gratification when you should have been
the king meeting people half way, leaving more from your share to make
others happy. But it seems only the greed of profits helps you grow and that
such greed is the only virtue in a free market. By such logic then you
should respect the right of some farmers not to sell their property if they
are unwilling to do so just because you as a buyer insist on it. Such is not
the sentiment of a free market; it is an even lesser sentiment of a free
society.

As the Singur struggle was going on, I was feeling the heat of rising
vegetable prices and soon enough the government admitted that the rise in
prices was also due to a slowdown in agricultural production. It suddenly
hit me that food production was dropping and indeed, the Planning Commission
was true when it said that 70% of India's farmers want to leave farming
because of the poor remuneration in the occupation. Since we cannot force
farmers to remain in agriculture when it yields them less money, we would
be, as the recent food price rise suggests, facing what one knows as food
insecurity. This is not a nice thing to happen especially since we know of
the Bengal Famine in 1943, barely sixty years ago killed three million
people and recently helped to give Amartya Sen his Nobel Prize. In this
light, we should be grateful to farmers who are still willing to produce
food for us. But you portray such farmers as lawless, violent, reactionary
and quaint just because they decide to feed us when most of them no longer
wish to do so. As an industry leader of the country I imagined that you
would be the one who should be alerting us to the grave crisis facing us in
terms of food insecurity and its greater crisis in the impending
corporatization of farming, instead, you show scant knowledge of the
importance of food growing lands and even scanter respect for informed
opinions who raise the issue.

There is a certain kind of economics of a global market and which requires
us to only concentrate on producing those goods that we are good at. The
rest of it we could buy. India is not an efficient producer of food, it is
an efficient producer of steel and cars, yours being the world's cheapest
ones. Thus, we could very well produce steel and cars and buy food. By such
switch we would be increasing the overall income of the country. This is
exactly where the case of the Nano fits. But away from this neat model,
there is a reality and which is that of food security and food sovereignty.
We know of a similar situation in the form of the oil economy, where no
matter how our economy has grown to prosperity we are still harassed by
rising oil price because we do not produce it by ourselves. Food, is an
essential commodity like steel and it is better that we produce the
subsistence quantities for ourselves by ourselves. Otherwise food prices
will play truant with us in the future and while we would be left with cheap
cars we would have our stomachs empty. Hunger, surely will not help us buy
your Nano, especially when your factory would employ no more than a mere
1500 persons progressively to be reduced in the pursuit of productivity.

As I was mulling over the Nano versus the food security issue, I stumbled
across an issue of the Statesman (19th September, Kolkata etc, front page)
in which there was a report on the area of land and capacity of the car
manufacturing plant. According to this report, you could have at most
required 700 acres of land for an annual capacity to manufacture 5 lakh cars
with ancillaries. The report listed out several car manufacturing companies
and their ancillaries and nowhere in the world, does a car company need as
much land as the Nano would need. What is even more pertinent is that in the
pursuit of competitiveness, you sack workers, reduce fuel consumption and
cut down on raw material consumption, I am curious to know why you are less
inclined to show such parsimony in the case of land, which is a scarce
resource.

When I reflect on the Nano project in Bengal, I feel that never in the
history of Bengal was a corporate body welcomed with such open arms. Bengal
was determined to change its image from being a militant trade unionist
state to one that would show up the ethos of good industrial culture.
Buddhababu bent backwards in projecting himself as one no more hostile to
the capitalists and one who promotes industry. Almost every one in Kolkata
lapped up in pride such an impending change in Bengal's future prospects.
The worker abandoned his demands for fair wages; the babu left his laziness
behind gearing up to work for you, the women in the farmer families looked
forward to opening up their canteens. But you disappointed everyone; you
left your vendors high and dry, left the Bengal exchequer strained with the
huge money that the government had spent for your project, got Mr Modi to
call Buddhababu and us Bengalis names and then decided to be kingmaker by
attempting to meddle with our political decision making through open
letters. As being the world's cheapest steel maker, the world's most
innovative car maker, the owner of the only private city in India, and being
the oldest industry house in the world's largest democracy you should have
been the one to remind the Bengal Chief Minister of the WTO issues of India,
our Planning Commission's concerns about agriculture and how we are deadly
worried about threats of hunger and why food security is the very core of a
successful industrial base. To top it all up, you have decided to fine the
residents of Bengal by demanding a huge compensation, which I believe would
be transferred to Mr Modi to keep the Gujarat balance sheet in order,
something that the "tolabaaj goondas" do in Kolkata. I am disappointed to
find in the country's most revered industry house the mentality of a cheap
extortionist, a blackmailer, and a self-aggrandized narcissist who forgets
that in giving us a car he also means to make his own profits, not normal
profits but super profits. I suspect, that in addition to the above, you
were also a land grabber.

Yours truly,



Susmita Dasgupta


-- 
Indranil Chakraborty





-- 
Bobby Kunhu http://community.eldis.org/myshkin/Blog/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to